VN-3 IS A CLAIMABLE ASSET

This has been going on too much on HOG: I make a VN-3 squad, then PricelineNegotiator trolls and takes it saying it is not claimable. Then JOLLY, among others, agree and say it isn't claimable. Then JEVSKI says it is. WHICH ONE IS IT? I don't know why you guys love Priceline so much. He is a troll when you're not around, and a troll when you are and you let him get away with it. That's all.

I have always considered it an asset. Since it takes 2 crewman to operate. Its an easy rule to remember, can you solo it then iti isnt claimable like the AA or crow, M113 or vab3

If it's claimable, then it needs to fall under APC. We can't have more asset squads now than we do for Trans, CAS, Tank, APC, etc. Won't leave enough squads left for infantry.

Yeah York, thats what I always have done.

So there are 9 squads available. If there is a CAS, Trans, Tank, APC and one more, say, VN-3 or mortars, that leaves 4 INF squad slots. This way the asset whores can whore assets and still have enough room for INF squads. However, the VN-3 is not a Tank, and its not an APC -class vehicle either. Its an IFV if anything. And Priceline is still a troll.

Grander the vn-3 is claimable, but under apc, just as the spandrel and the Scorpion is under apc.