×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

Soupy Delicious - Port Stanley incident

More
7 years 10 months ago #9168 by Soup
Replied by Soup on topic Soupy Delicious - Port Stanley incident

ban is lifted.


Thank you.

Make your job easier by encouraging your companions to go easy on the force behind their banhammer.
  • =HOG= __Super_6__5__
  • =HOG= __Super_6__5__'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
7 years 10 months ago #9169 by =HOG= __Super_6__5__
Replied by =HOG= __Super_6__5__ on topic Soupy Delicious - Port Stanley incident
no, we strongly suggest you encourage your companions to view and abide by our rules, they ARE your warning and are located in an area on the website that does not require registering to view them. THAT would make our/my job easier.

This server has been running for a decade and we have been operating it similarly ever since.
More
7 years 10 months ago - 7 years 10 months ago #9205 by Soup
Replied by Soup on topic Soupy Delicious - Port Stanley incident
No space for understanding with you freakin guys. If that's how you've been running for the past decade then my memory is failing me. I was on FCV the other day, I asked "what are you doing in this dead server when HOG is well pop'd?". Three people came out and said immediately that they had been banned. One was dorhj, who is a serious player, got banned for not having a mic and going commander.

You justify all these curbstompy bans by saying that 'we should have read the rules', and that's the same mentality that makes some policemen right fucking assholes.

I was just banned again yesterday, for something that only deserved a kick. Me, an ordinarily serious player, happens to have days where the world aint treating them right, and I couldn't take my match seriously.

Basically, a kick was well deserved. I am not a repeat offender, in fact I am a rare offender, and my previous ban was caused by the map not showing that I was in a bloody fucking Main base. This one I was actually being silly, but like I said, not ban-worthy so I decree.

So I'm going to have to strongly suggest what I suggested in my previous post. Note I said to 'go easy on the FORCE'. I'm not telling you to not ban a fucker. I'm telling your compadres to bloody control their fury. I'm one of the serious players who came to PR, and away from Battlefield 4, but I'm still human, and when I can see that others arent taking a match seriously, mixed with me having a sad old fucking day, it's going to be hard not to fly around main while waiting..

Edit: I just went and read through the ban appeal for Dorhj from a while back, and I'm pretty disgusted. These rules that you so firmly reinforce were originally made for what? Were they made for the sake of themselves? No, they were, like most rules, made to keep bad people doing bad things.
Dorhj's ban appeal was a perfect example of you completely missing the point of rules, and I bet that gets you heated being told by some commoner that you are missing the point of your own rules, and I'm sorry. Like I said, disgusted. You aren't keeping the bad people out, you are quite actually getting rid of the good guys too.

I don't expect an unban after this post; and that's fine with me. There's a difference between strictness and impatience.
Last edit: 7 years 10 months ago by Soup.
  • =HOG=Haley11thACR
  • =HOG=Haley11thACR's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
7 years 10 months ago #9208 by =HOG=Haley11thACR
Replied by =HOG=Haley11thACR on topic Soupy Delicious - Port Stanley incident
stop raging...even if you offered valid criticism its lost in the rant. might want to regroup and tone it down a bit. as far as fcv goes we have banned about every player there, as have many other servers... its affectionately known as the penal colony for a reason.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Soup
  • =HOG= __Super_6__5__
  • =HOG= __Super_6__5__'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
7 years 10 months ago #9211 by =HOG= __Super_6__5__
Replied by =HOG= __Super_6__5__ on topic Soupy Delicious - Port Stanley incident
I know you guys that dont WANT to abide by any rules disagree with all this, i mean, why wouldnt you, you get banned for it but what it does for the server is it keeps it going and going and going. Isnt that the point of it? We arent't going to provide a server for it to sit idle like the 35 other servers in the list.

If how we run our server is SOOOO BAAADD, how in the hell does it stay populated for so many years?

Go check out the other servers rules my friend, you will find that MOST have more rules than we do, the difference?? We enforce ours, why have rules if we do not enforce them?
More
7 years 10 months ago #9212 by Soup
Replied by Soup on topic Soupy Delicious - Port Stanley incident

I know you guys that dont WANT to abide by any rules disagree with all this, i mean, why wouldnt you, you get banned for it but what it does for the server is it keeps it going and going and going. Isnt that the point of it? We arent't going to provide a server for it to sit idle like the 35 other servers in the list.

If how we run our server is SOOOO BAAADD, how in the hell does it stay populated for so many years?

Go check out the other servers rules my friend, you will find that MOST have more rules than we do, the difference?? We enforce ours, why have rules if we do not enforce them?


I can see that you have come across many butthurt-banees, and so your responses to things that I hadn't even implied are understandable.
My favourite server back in the old days was BigD, and the admins were fucking tyrnants. It was beautiful, really, to see a server completely clean. Maybe haylee is right in that my point was lost in the rant, but the least you could do is not resort to stretching out what I'm saying to extreme and untrue lengths.

You can SEE very clearly that what I'm saying is nowhere near the realm of condemning the entire server. I even ended my wall of text with the moral of the story, and you go on ahead and pull this shit on me: "I know you guys that dont WANT to abide by any rules disagree with all this". I saw it in the post with Dorhj too, this very same thing. It reminds me of an old book with a black guy and a judge, and after all the entreaties from the poor old guy, all the explaining and reasoning, the judge turns up his nose and condemns the man as if he had not heard a word he said.

He had a disposition against black people, you have one against trolls. I will end my post once again with the moral of the story: not all rulebreakers are trolls.
Time to create page: 0.142 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum