Rule study

Super has given me permission to post for opinions as we do not see eye to eye on this. Is this within the rules?
Please watch before posting an opinion, thanks.

Do not be confused. That's illegal.

The AA was being crewed by me and it was miscalculation. I was surprised that this was actually possible.

The expected range of the AA was 1200, but doing some research on realitymod forums following this incident, I found out that the range of AA assets varies depending on map sizes.

I had also positioned my vehicle in a place I had not intended to avoid some infantry. The original location would have blocked my visibility to the main base, allowing me to engage without endangering the main base.

If the AA had been limited to 1200 meters, this would not have happened.

Being the one involved, I apologize and I definitely do not condone attacks on main bases.

Here is complementary information on the incident:



Upon realizing that something wasn't right, I moved the vehicle so as to not endanger the main base.

BTW: When I shot the Jet, I assumed it was south of South Outpost and wondered why it was so extremely low.

Thank you for taking your time to give a detailed answer and perspective, but as super pointed out you may not be breaking any rules. "4.1 Do not attack enemy bases unless there is a capable flag on it. Bases that have no flag on them are considered out of limits." It does say enemy main base, it does not say DOD so there could be some confusion on this.

I think everyone understands that DoD is a part of the main base.

ZIPPO wrote:

I think everyone understands that DoD is a part of the main base.

I thought DoD was part of main as well.