ban appeal

=HOG= wrote:

I absolutely see your point but our issue is its just another thing we have to keep up with.

Then the isis assholes would have their websites

Then the porn sites

Then the .......and so on. Its just too much to handle im afraid.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Frankly, if someone were stupid enough to connect to a game server using a name which promoted an ISIS propaganda site, they ought to be more concerned about being arrested and interrogated by their country's security services than about being banned from HOG.

So, I'm not allowed to use samharris.org because porn and ISIS. Uh-huh...

Come on dude. We're being respectful to one another, which is the best thing ...but please, see when the other man has given you a good argument, and so the right thing. Please don't ban amharris.org ...if so, you are fighting against the good guys. The same set of ethics inclining reasonable people to demote ISIS will incline those same people to promote a secular scientific compassionate thinker such as Sam Harris. Do the right thing here.

^ For those who have no idea who Sam Harris is.

=HOG= wrote:

we would have to allow other questionable websites if we allowed yours. i know you can see this.

Yes, and I would encourage you to remember that there is nothing bad about this. Individual players will ALWAYS have to choose which sites they do or do not visit, WHATEVER policy you adopt towards names. You don't have to ban ANYTHING.

If you want a responsible society then give society responsibility. Same goes for gaming communities.