×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

Server Rules vs. Strategy vs. Ethical game play

  • =HOG= __Super_6__5__
  • =HOG= __Super_6__5__'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
7 years 9 months ago #9444 by =HOG= __Super_6__5__
The following user(s) said Thank You: Im Druid
  • TheMerchantOfMenace
  • TheMerchantOfMenace's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
7 years 9 months ago - 7 years 9 months ago #9523 by TheMerchantOfMenace
Replied by TheMerchantOfMenace on topic Server Rules vs. Strategy vs. Ethical game play
Dogfart wrote: "Another rule: NO CHAT SPAMMING

So, playing Beirut as Russian the other night and our team had capped and neutralized to the Western bridge. While attempting to flank south my squad got trapped by an angry enemy tank. What's a poor squaddie to do? Well, what I did was type in all chat, "Hey Tank! get back to the flag and defend...we're about to lose it!" The idea being that just maybe the crew in the enemy tank would mistake the ALL CHAT for TEAM CHAT and boogie. Which he did...which saved my squad. They were unanimously impressed and relieved."

So what about this one? Is Ruiz's reply referring to this part of Dog's post?

In this case, it seems that it would be Ok and legitimate, within the spirit of the "no-spam" rule, since his chat was a game-related tactic, and in no way seems like any kind of chat abuse or waste, and it was not an on-going, multiplicity of chats, but then, it all comes down to the server Admins' definition of what constitutes "spam", I guess.

Just curious, 'cause I also don't want to be guilty of chat-spamming, and I don't like to test, nor push rules for the fun of it, but do rather prefer to play within the rules and focus on the gameplay.
Last edit: 7 years 9 months ago by TheMerchantOfMenace. Reason: Added "Dogfart wrote:" at start of 1st paragraph to clarify the post.
Time to create page: 0.132 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum